No-Justice

No-Justice

A pensioner sick and tired of the justice system

I am a pensioner who has been affected by and seen injustice all around me for too many years. Now we have to fight back for the sake of ours kids and their future. We are hte ones who put ourselves in this situation and now we are selling their future.

TRAITORS

Injustice!Posted by Roy Jenkins 07 Sep, 2009 11:04:11

RIP

HERE LIES ENGLAND KILLED BY SHAME.

DATE OF START OF DEATH 1ST MAY 1997-FINISHED OFF COMPLETELY IN 2009

MY COUNTRY ENGLAND WAS KILLED OFF BY TRAITORS IN CHARGE OF GOVERNMENT, THE HOUSE OF CROOKS (COMMONS) AND BY THE HOUSE OF LORDS BY PEERS NOMINATED AND GIVEN TITLES FOR THEIR ABILITY TO COVER UP CRIMINAL ACTS COMMITTED BY MEMBERS OF GOVERNMENT AND OPPOSING PARTIES BY BLIAR AND BROWN.

NAMED ARE A FEW OF THE WORST TRAITORS- BLAIR-BROWN-STRAW-DARLING-PRESCOTT-MANDELSON-TONY WRIGHT MP, BLUNKETT-CLARKE-REID-MARTIN AND MANY OTHERS INCLUDING TORIES-LIBERALS-UKIP

ENGLAND WAS ONCE A GREAT COUNTRY IT WAS KNOW FOR ITS COMPASSION, HONESTY, WORK ETHICS, ETHICS, MORALS, ITS WILLINGNESS TO FIGHT AND DIE FOR OTHERS SO THAT THEY MAY LIVE IN PEACE. THIS WAS KNOWN THROUGHOUT THE CENTURIES BY OTHERS THROUGHOUT THE WORLD.

PEOPLE WOULD RESIGN IN SHAME AND DISAPPEAR FROM THE PUBLIC EYE IF THEY WERE CAUGHT DOING WRONG. THE TRAITORS IN AUTHORITY TODAY NOW WEAR THE MEDAL OF SHAME AS IF IT WAS AN HEROIC DEED.

ENGLAND WILL RISE AGAINsmiley I AM HEARTENED BY THE MEN AND WOMEN I NOW SEE FIGHTING FOR THE CAUSE NAMELY THE RETURN OF ENGLAND OF OLD, NOT THE SLIME BAG POLITCIANS AND MEMBERS OF THE HOUSE OF LORDS WE HAVE TODAY WHO SELL OUT ENGLAND TO THE HIGHEST BIDDER.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

HOW DO WE EXPLAIN TO OUR CHILDREN AND GRANDCHILDREN FOR THE MESS ENGLAND IS NOW IN, WHAT DO WE TELL THEM WHEN THEY ASK US WHY DID WE LET IT HAPPEN? WE ARE NOW A SELFISH NATION MADE SO BY TRAITORS IN GOVERNMENT. I LOOK AT POLITIANS HOMES AND WONDER HOW CAN THEY PAY FOR SEVERAL HOMES ON AN INCOME OF ROUGHLY £64,000-00 PER ANNUM. HOW DO THEY MANAGE THE SEVERAL FOREIGN HOLIDAYS PER YEAR?? BLIAR HAS ALLEGEDLY EARNED OVER 12 MILLION POUNDS SINCE LEAVING NUMBER TEN NOT BAD FOR SOMEONE WHO SPOUTED DEMOCRACY AND EQUALITY FOR ALL.

THOUGH I DIDN'T AGREE WITH EVEYTHING THATCHER SAID AND DID AT LEAST SHE DEFENDED ENGLAND TO THE HILT.

I REMEMBER HEATH PM, TELLING US IN 1973? IT WAS A GOOD THING TO JOIN THE EU, THE BENEFITS WE WOULD GET FROM IT, NOTHING WOULD CHANGE POLITICALLY. I DID WRITE AND ASK COULD HE GIVE A CLEARER DEFINITION OF THE GOOD IT WOULD DO MY COUNTRY AND WHAT EXACTLY WAS IT GOING TO COST US. I WAS TOLD I WAS ANTI SOCIAL AND ANTI EU. WE THEN FIND OUT AFTER THE 25 OR 30 YEAR PERIOD BEFORE POLITICAL DOCUMENTS COULD BE RELEASED THAT HEATH PM HAD IN FACT TOLD HIS CABINET AND AIDES TO SIGN ANYTHING BUT GET US INTO THE EU, NOW WE SEE THE REAL COST TO ENGLAND. I HOPE THE BASTARD ROTS IN HELL.

_________________________________________________________

I'M A SIMPLE MAN WITH SIMPLE PLEASURES FOOTBALL, RUGBY, CRICKET, WATCHING WOMEN, I OFTEN SIT BACK AND WONDER HOW WE AS A GREAT NATION HAVE GOT TO THE STATE WE ARE NOW IN, THEN I WAKE UP AND REALISE THE TRUTH. BENT AND CORRUPT POLITICIANS, POLICE/ CUSTOMS OFFICERS, GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS. AGAIN I OFTEN GO BACK OVER BLIAR'S STATEMENTS AND WONDER HOW THE PUBLIC EVER BOUGHT HIS PROPAGANDA, LORD HAW HAW SPRINGS TO MIND IMMEDIATELY EVERYTIME BLIAR OPENS HIS MOUTH AND SPEAKS.

WE NOW READ FROM PREVIOUS MANDERINS OF THIS GOVERNMENT THAT BLIAR, BROWN AND CO HAVE CHANGED OUR CONSTITUTIONS TO MAKE OUR GOVERNMENT MORE OF A PRESIDENCY. WHY DIDN'T THE MANDERIN'S COME OUT OF THE WOODWORK WHILE ALL THIS WAS GOING ON, THE ANSWER IS SIMPLE FEAR OF LOSING THEIR TITLES, PENSIONS AND PERKS. I HAVE TO WONDER IS THERE ANY HONEST PEOPLE IN ANY GOVERNMENT AUTHORITIES AT ALL, OR HAVE THEY BEEN BRAINWASHED ENOUGH BY THE FABIEN SOCIETY TO BELIEVE THAT THE HURT AND DAMAGE THEY CAUSE TO ENGLAND IS JUSTIFIED??

_______________________________________________________________

IN THE MID EIGHTIES I MET WITH A POLITICAL REFUGEE FROM BEHIND THE OLD IRON CURTAIN, APPARENTLY HIS CRIME WAS HE WAS AN INTELLECTUAL WHO HAD THOUGHTS OF HIS OWN. I SPENT AN AFTERNOON AND EVENING WITH THIS GENTLEMAN WE TALKED OF MANY THINGS, WARS- POLITICIANS-EVENTS AROUND THE WORLD, WHILE NOT PRETENDING TO BE AN INTELLECT I HAVE LIVED AND STUDIED THE SCHOOL OF LIFE, WHILE TALKING TO THIS GENTLEMAN HE SUDDENLY STARTED TO TALK ABOUT EVENTS TAKING PLACE IN ENGLAND AND THE UK IN GENERAL IN FACT HE WAS WARNING ME OF WHAT WAS TO COME, BUT AT THAT PARTICULAR MOMENT IT DIDN'T MAKE A LOT OF SENSE TO ME AS ENGLAND WAS KNOWN AS A FREE AND DEMOCRATIC COUNTRY, HOW STUPID I WAS NOT TO TAKE EVERYTHING IN.

THIS GENTLEMAN POINTED OUT TO ME THAT THERE WERE PEOPLE IN THE LABOUR PARTY IN PARTICULAR THAT WERE OLD STYLE COMMUNISTS THROUGH AND THROUGH, HE STATED THEY INTENDED TO DESTROY THE BASICS OF MY COUNTRY AND HAND OVER POWERS TO OTHERS AND THAT THIS WAS GOING ON AS WE SPOKE, I POINTED OUT TO HIM THAT THE ENGLISH PEOPLE WOULD NEVER STAND FOR THIS, JUST HOW STUPID CAN YOU GET AND THERE I WAS THINKING I WAS WORDLY WISE.

IT CAME TO PASS THAT ON THE 1ST OF MAY 1997 THE COMMUNIST WORLD ENTERED ENGLAND C/O BLIAR AND HIS CRONIES, THEY HAVE DONE WHAT HITLER COULD NEVER ACHIEVE, THEY HAVE SURRENDERED ENGLAND TO FOREIGN NATIONS, NAMELY THE EU. THIS IS A FACIST STATE, WE SEE THIS WHEN FRANCE AND HOLLAND THEN IRELAND DEMANDED THE RIGHTS TO A REFERENDUM. WE THEN SEE THE EU THROWING THEIR DUMMIES OUT OF THE PRAM AND THE FRENCH PRESIDENT CALLING THE IRISH VOTERS IDIOTS.

I AUTOMATICALLY GO BACK TO THE CONVERSATION I HAD WITH THE REFUGEE AND EVERYTHING HE STATED HAS COME TRUE SADLY.

________________________________________________________

WE ARE NOW IN A POLICE STATE THAT IS NOW VIRTUALLY FREE FROM THE ORDERS OF NUMBER TEN, IT HAS BECOME THE NORM OVER THE LAST TWENTY YEARS OR SO FOR POLICE TO COVER UP CRIMINAL ACTS OF OTHER POLICE OFFICERS, POLITICIANS, GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS, BANKS ETC. THIS HAS BEEN PROVED NOT ONLY BY MYSELF BUT MANY OTHERS WHO CAMPAIGN, SOME OF THEM SERVING POLICE OFFICERS, EX SPECIAL BRANCH OFFICERS AND MANY MORE, WE CAN'T ALL BE WRONG OR LIARS EVEN THOUGH BLIAR AND CO STATED WE ARE.

CAN SOMEONE PLEASE EXPLAIN TO ME HOW A HACK REPORTER ALISTAIR CAMPBELL AND NOT A VERY GOOD ONE AT THAT CAN TAKE QUESTION AND ANSWERS FROM THE PRESS AT NUMBER TEN AND ACTING AS IF HE WAS THE PRIME MINISTER STANDING BEHIND A ROSTRUM SIMILAR IN STYLE TO THE USA PRESIDENCY ONE? CAN SOME ONE PLEASE EXPLAIN HOW CAMPBELL HAD THE GOD GIVEN RIGHT TO STORM INTO TELEVISION STUDIOS AND DEMAND HE BE GIVEN VIEWING TIME TO DENY WHAT THE BBC REPORTER HAD SAID ABOUT BLIAR AND THE WAR IN IRAQ. WHO ELSE IN ANY OTHER JOB IN THE UK OR ANYWHERE ELSE IN THE WORLD HAD/HAS THIS POWER?? IT CLEARLY SHOWS HOW CORRUPT NUMBER TEN IS.

CAMPBELL APPEARED BEFORE A COMMITTE OF POLITICIANS IN THE HOUSE OF CROOKS DENYING THAT EITHER HE OR BLIAR HAD HAD ALTERED STATEMENTS MADE BY CIVIL SERVANTS REGARDS THE WAR IN IRAQ. WE NOW SEE THAT BLIAR AND CAMPBELL LIED AT THESE COMMITTEE'S SO WHY ARE THEY STILL AT LIBERTY AND NOT IN JAIL. FABIEN SOCIETY YET AGAIN.

HOW DO YOU HAVE INDEPENDENT INQUIRIES WHEN THE PEOPLE BEING INVESTIGATED (BLIAR) PICKS THE HEAD OF THE INQUIRY AND THEN LAYS OUT THE RULES OF WHAT QUESTIONS CAN BE ASKED OF THE PEOPLE INVOLVED.

HAS ANYONE SEEN ANY SINGLE PERSON RESIGN OVER THE DR. KELLY FIASCO????? NAHHHHHHHHHH NOR ME, THE INFORMATION WE HAVE READILY AVAILABLE NOW SHOWS DR. KELLY HAD TOLD THE TRUTH ALL ALONG REGARDS WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION WHEN HE STATED THEY DIDN'T EXIST AS BLIAR KNEW WELL. A CIA AGENT WHO INTERVIEWED/GRILLED SADAM HUSSEIN HAS ADMITTED THAT HUSSEIN HAD STATED HE HAD LIED OVER THE WOMD SIMPLY BECAUSE HE WAS AFRAID IRAN ALREADY HAD THEM.

REST IN PEACE DR. KELLY HOPEFULLY YOU WILL NOT HAVE DIED IN VAIN THESE TRAITORS WILL PAY BY LOSING THEIR LIBERTY AND WEALTH.

_________________________________________________________

WE NOW SEE THE RATS DESERTING A FAST SINKING SHIP, BUT WHY SHOULD THEY WORRY THEY HAVE PENSIONS NORMAL PEOPLE CAN ONLY DREAM OF, HOW DID THESE TRAITORS AND SCUMBAGS GET THESE PENSIONS AND PERKS, THEY GAVE IT TO THEMSELVES. WE NOW HAVE AN EXPLOSION OF ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS AND ASYLUM SEEKERS WHO ARE NEVER GOING TO BE DEPORTED BY ANY GOVERNMENT NEW OR OLD, WHY??THEY ARE CERTAIN VOTES FOR POLITICIANS. WE THE ENGLISH ARE NOW THIRD RATE CITIZENS AND UNLESS YOU GET OFF YOUR ARSES AND DO SOMETHING YOU WILL SURELY BECOME 4TH RATE CITIZENS.

THE LIKES OF BROWN, CAMERON, CLEGG, FARAGE DON'T GIVE A MONKEYS FOR THE PUBLIC ONLY THEMSELVES. WHY ARE 20,000 PLUS PENSIONERS DYING EVERY YEAR FROM COLD AND HUNGER AREN'T WE SUPPOSSED TO BE A CARING NATION, WHY ARE SPECIAL SCHOOLS AND OAP HOMES CLOSED THROUGH ALLEGED LACK OF FUNDS WHEN THE LIKES OF TONY WRIGHT MP AND HIS RESEARCHER SUSAN WOODWARD PROSPECTIVE PARLIAMENTARY CANDIDATE HAVE BEEN GIVEN PROOF OF CRIMINAL FRAUD BY COMPANIES ON A MASSIVE SCALE?? BLIAR, BROWN, CAMERON, CLEGG AND CO ALL RECEIVED THE SAME PROOF.

FOR TODAY THAT IS ENOUGH, I'M HERE IN SWEDEN AND I'M OFF FOR A CASUAL WALK IN STUNNING COUNTRYSIDE, I'M NOT AN ANGRY PERSON, A NUTTER OR AS BLIAR AND HIS TRAITORS IN CUSTOMS HAVE CALLED ME A WALTER MITTY TYPE, I JUST FEEL STRONGLY FOR THE STATE MY COUNTRY ENGLAND IS IN AND THE HEAPS OF DEBTS LEFT FOR THE CHILDREN AND GRANDCHILDREN OF THIS ONCE GREAT COUNTRY ENGLAND TO HAVE TO REPAY. 1.8 TRILLION OF DEBTS LEFT BY THIS GOVERNMENT OF TRAITORS AND THAT IS ONLY WHAT THEY HAVE BEEN FORCED TO ADMIT TO, 1.7 TRILLION OF PERSONAL DEBTS OF THE PUBLIC WHAT A MESS BUT ALL IN LINE WITH BLIAR AND CO'S PLANS.

WE WILL WALK TALL AND WITH PRIDE AGAIN DESPITE THE TRAITORS IN CHARGE. BE WARNED MANY OF US ARE OUT TO MAKE YOU PAY FOR YOUR CRIMINAL ACTS. BYE FOR NOW.

GET SNOUTS OUT THE TROUGH PARTY

T


Fill in only if you are not real





The following XHTML tags are allowed: <b>, <br/>, <em>, <i>, <strong>, <u>. CSS styles and Javascript are not permitted.
Posted by Raymond Graves 11 Apr, 2014 11:47:51

I have just received permission to appeal from The Court of Appeal.

My case is almost identical to Roy Jenkins 's except it was CHL taking my house rather than the Bradford and Bingley.

I might be able to work with Roy to help him and me.



Posted by Iain 30 Jan, 2013 23:31:50

You are mad !!! Dont know why i have read this rubbish you have come out with

Posted by Me 12 Nov, 2012 15:22:27

(1) Its not useful to you or to your cause isolating yourself from others who may support your general aims.Providing a web contact form or email address is a good idea.(2) Your threat is meaningless. That is NOT the legal way to do it."The PoliceTHIS IS TO CONFIRM THAT THE FOLLOWING DOCUMENTS ARE PRIVATE PROPERTY, ANYONE WISHING TO USE ANYTHING FROM THESE DOCUMENTS NEEDS TO GET PERMISSION FROM MYSELF TO DO SO FIRST, YOU WILL BE EXPECTED TO PROVIDE A GOOD REASON FOR ASKING. ANYONE USING THESE DOCUMENTS WITHOUT PERMISSION WILL BE PROSECUTED."(3) Your web page coding needs improving. You must bring more structure into it. Also use CSS and set the line-height to 150%, font-size to 18px for easier reading and make paragraphs and not junks of "dead" text. Perhaps add letter-spacing 0.1px;

Posted by neil scott 23 May, 2010 11:38:40

Stewart GREEN's Statement 28th July 2009 – (Page 6-8 PDF DOC110110)

GREEN's first visit on Sunday 22nd March at 12:15.

(a) The property was not sealed as a crime scene when GREEN concluded his investigations on Sunday 22nd March 2009.

Evidence collected:
SG/1 Digital images showing scene, damage & footwear mark
SG/2 Control paint sample – front room floor
SG/3 Swab of apparent blood from inside next to front door handle
SG/4 Swab of apparent blood from back of radiator – removed from wall
SG/5 Swab of apparent blood from inside front bedroom window

(b) 48 Hours later on Tuesday 24th March 2009, GREEN revisited the property and obtained further evidence marked as SG/6 SG/7, SG/8 and SG/11.

(c) The Owners/Tenant revisited the property, inviting numerous people into the property to view the damage. These visits occurred the latter part of Sunday 22nd March and Monday 23rd March 2009.

GREEN failed to seal the property for further investigation. Therefore, exhibits collected on the 24th , March marked as SG/6, SG/7, SG/8 and SG/11, must be regarded contaminated or doubtful, as there is a possibility the crime scene could have been altered substantially after the event by unknown persons

SG7 Digital images showing kitchen window
SG8 Tool cast from kitchen window
SG11 An indexed album of digital images including SG7

The issue of exhibits marked as SG3, SG4 and SG5 is dealt with later.


Alastair CRAWFORD's Statement 22nd July 2009– (Page 13-14 PDF DOC110110)

CRAWFORD states categorically that he attended

".... 155 Marshal Avenue, the address of the neighbour.".

This was on Monday 23rd March at 12:45hrs. Outside of the property's front door and front pathway, CRAWFORD maintains he found

"... partial footprints in brown and red paint...".

The footprints are leading away from the property and there is no evidence to suggest a trail of footprints from the crime scene, which one would expect. Neither is there any evidence of footprints inside SCOTT’s property, that would indicate a connection. In short, there is no paint trail made by footprints from the crime scene onto the neighbouring property. They just seem to appear from nowhere.

Furthermore, SCOTT lives at 155 Pallister Avenue. Therefore, evidence collected from 155 Marshall Avenue, as stated by CRAWFORD, would appear not to have been taken from SCOTT's home address. Exhibits in question:

AC/1 Right Adidas Samba shoe
AC/2 Left Adidas Samba shoe
AC/3 A crowbar

The element of reasonable doubt is raised against the exhibits produced.

SCOTT was duly arrested on suspicion of burglary and taken into custody on 23rd March 2009. After which and as per statement, CRAWFORD executed a Section 18 Search Warrant on SCOTT's home. Or did he?

On page 3 of PDF file DOC050110, there is a copy of Form G10-10 Statutory Power under Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984. As it is the only one present included in the disclosure papers, I must assume this is the existing authority to search SCOTT’s home, whilst he was under arrest on the 23rd of March 2009.

However, there appears to be anomalies. The date the authority was signed and once again, the address. Regardless of whether or not this is the correct authority, there still remains the fact that CRAWFORD’s statement, states clearly that he attended on Monday 23rd March 2009 12:45hrs at;

".... 155 Marshal Avenue, the address of the neighbour.".

Unless there are further statements I am not aware of, I can only conclude that CRAWFORD is either totally inept at carry his work out or, he is deliberately lying and perverting the course of justice for reasons unclear at present.


Stewart GREEN – Witness Statement 28th July 2009 – 22.03.09 / 11:15hrs

(1)

EXHIBIT 1 SG/1: 22.03.09/11:15hrs Digital images showing scene, damage & footwear
marks

Locard Reference Number Secure storage 17/M/09/3742 – EXHIBIT 4 SG/9 &
SG/6

(2)

NO EXHIBIT SG/2 22.03.09/11:15hrs Control paint sample – front room

NO EXHIBIT SG/3: 22.03.09/11:15hrs Apparent blood sample – Inside next to front door
handle
EXHIBIT 7 SG/4: 22.03.09/11:15hrs Blood sample found at scene - Rear of hallway
radiator
NO EXHIBIT SG/5: 22.03.09/11:15hrs Apparent blood sample – Inside front bedroom
window.

The following on page 2, appears to be a further statement or doubling up of statement, added on.

GREEN re-attended or attended ? 28th July 2009 – 22.03.09 / 12:15hrs

EXHIBIT 6 SG/6: 22.03.09/12:15hrs Master & working copy of showing paint on footpath

Note 1: Taken from a property given as 155 Marshall
Avenue Middlesbrough.
Locard Reference Number 17/M/09/3742

Note 2: 10 Millbrooke Avenue is left unsealed for further
forensic work to be carried out. Therefore, any further evidence collected from the property must be
considered as contaminated evidence.

GREEN re-attended 10 Millbrooke Avenue on Tuesday 24th March 2009

EXHIBIT 3 SG/7 24.03.09 Master & working copy of images showing kitchen
Window – No secure storage reference

NO EXHIBIT SG/8 24.03.09 Tool cast from kitchen window – No secure storage
reference


Alasitair CRAWFORD – Witness Statement 30th June 2009 – 23.03.09

23.03.09 *12:45hrs Attended 155 Marshal Avenue and noticed partial footprints in
red and brown at the front door of the house. As a consequence he arrested Neil SCOTT on suspicion of burglary

Clarification is required exactly what time SCOTT’s DNA and blood sample was taken, as SCOTT maintains his blood sample had been obtained without his solicitor being present. The time is crucial, bearing in mind SG/3. SG/4 and SG/5 were apparently in unsecured transit between 13:02 and 13:55 (PACEY}.

Note 3: GREEN states footprints are on garden path, not at front door. Check
photographs

No time given CRAWFORD states he returned to 155 Marshal Avenue and
executed a S.18 search and obtained evidence AC/1, AC/2 and AC/3

Note 4: The original search warrant obtained on 23rd March 2009, needs to
be checked for SCOTT’s correct address and date of issue.

Interview SCOTT

Commenced 17:39hrs CRAWFORD informed SCOTT that he had sent blood from the
radiator for forensics. Why state specifically the radiator?

Note 5: There are 3 apparent blood samples. How did
CRAWFORD know that the SG/4 radiator sample would prove a
positive match and as being blood, not paint at this early stage?

Re MILNER: Apparent blood sample(s) had not been transported for
forensic or DNA analysis until 16th April 2009.

Note 6: CRAWFORD asked SCOTT if he had cut himself in the house.
SCOTT demonstrated he had no cuts. There is no connection of a
wound on SCOTT that could be responsible for his blood being
dripped on the radiator at the time of the incident




Witness Statement of Jo PACEY – Footwear Technician

23.03.09 *13.02hrs PACEY removed the following securely packaged, sealed and
labeled exhibits, SSS Reference 17/M/09/3742 from secure storage.
This included SG/3, SG/4 and SG/5. Why? PACEY is a footwear technician employed by Cleveland Police. She had no professional need for these apparent blood samples in this case. I accept that PACEY could have been acting simply as a courier.

PACEY also removed SG/1 and SG/6, this included the first exhibits obtained by GREEN on the 22nd March 2009. PACEY states she sealed the above in a transit box with an integrity seal number 1700367000. PACEY further states, the exhibits remain in her possession during transportation to Police HQ, Ladgate Lane.

**13:55 PACEY handed over SG/3, SG/4 and SG/5 to C7891 MILNER
within the Central Submissions Unit. There is also no mention of the
transit box being unsealed.

Note 7: Who instructed PACEY to transport the exhibits, CRAWFORD?

14:45 PACEY then states, handing the sealed transit box to C8119
COCHRANE within the Photographic Unit

Note 8: From the above, it would appear that exhibits SG/3, SG/4 and SG/5,
had never been sealed within the transit box carrying integrity seal
number 1700367000, as stated by PACEY on page 1 of her witness
statement.

Therefore, where is the transit integrity seal for SG/3, SG/4 and SG/5? If these exhibits were not held under a integrity seal whilst in transition, there is no alternative but to consider this evidence as contaminated or at risk from interference. The evidence therefore cannot be relied upon.

A further question is raised regarding the time delay between delivery
of the separated exhibits and the 55 minute time gap between
handovers. Why is there such a large time difference?




Witness Statement of Janice MILNER – Central Submissions Unit Manager, Police HQ

23.03.09 **No time Stated, received from PACEY, the following sample relating
to Scientific Support job reference number M/09/3742:

SG/4 Swab & Control – Swab of apparent blood

The sample was placed in a secure store within the Scientific Support
Unit.

Note 9: There is no arrival time stated by MILNER of receipt, therefore, the
time log of the Central Submissions Unit needs to be checked.

Plus, there is no identification or confirmation of SG/4 being handed
over under sealed integrity conditions whilst in transit. Once again,
we find there is no alternative but to consider this evidence as
contaminated or at risk from interference. The evidence therefore
should be relied upon.

Note 10: Finally, SG/3 and SG/5 have vanished into thin air. This appears to
have occurred whilst in the possession of PACEY.

CRAWFORD returned to SCOTT’s property, albeit stating the
wrong address. This places him at the crime scene during the time
PACEY was transporting SG/3, SG/4 and SG/5.



Witness Statement of Malcolm Frederick REYNOLDS - Tenant of 10 Millbrook Avenue – 22nd March 2009

REYNOLDS statement is unsigned and therefore inadmissible as evidence.



Witness Statement of Mark McMANN – Property Manager of 10 Millbrook Avenue – 30th June 2009

McMANN statement is unsigned and therefore also inadmissible as evidence.

Note 11: CRAWFORD and McMANN, both made their witness statements on
22nd March 2009.
*my name is neil scott i live at 155 palister ave, bfarm,middlesbrough,07770591290,our mayor is a criminal called ray mallon,
*
*
*in middlesbrough police station and the area ,deaths that have come out of news from middlesbrough is ,
suicide victim,whos family warned police about her past,women found dead in a middlehaven station cells,when it is a 8 million pound station, with patrols every half hour, and with the latest updated cctv footage that seems to dissapear when it suits the police,
alan atkin found dead in his home
a 37 year old male was also found dead in the station middlehaven,when it is a 8 million pound station, with patrols every half hour, and with the latest updated cctv footage that seems to dissapear when it suits the police,
eric cutler found dead at the bottom of his stairs with a black bag over his head ,died of unknown causes,THIS MAN HELPED ME IN A STATEMENT WHEN ID HAD TROUBLE WITH A SCOURNED EX PARTNER,IN 2002
DARREN COULSONfound hanging in his cell at holmehouse prison,the same prison mallon was supposed to be supplying drugs into for informationmy next door neighbour,vinny, whilst i was working in manchester for three weeks vinny was found dead on his stiars as if he had been scared to death by something his heart was to blame ,yet vinny never told me about this problem the 10 years i lived atmy home talking to vinny and his brother
ashok kumar died as a result of a heart attack, in his home on his own,ashok dealt with operation lancett enquiree and pushed for no more allegations aginst serving officers of cleveland police force or ray mallon,to this mallons record was cleared even though he admitted to a hearing to 14 offences out of 400,
*
*
*in jan09 the police decided to pursue an allegation of speeding towards me to get straight at my full clean pcv with cpc entitlements,
this was followed by an appeal
the officer stated that from the roundabout at marske road at a distance of 192 metres he said that he caught me ,with an lti 2020,home office approaved speed detection device,doing a maximum of 60mph,
this i apposed clearly,it went to court and i was found guilty of the offence,without being allowed a solicitor or leagal aid,i was given 6points and a £350 fine,at no time when asked did the officer simpson deny making any mistakes on court transcripts at guisbrough courts,of course i appealed this sentance labelling it iamed at my clean licence because they couldnt get to me with a crime of any nature,we introduced a fully experienced ex ffiicer,who had qualifications in road traffice accidents for over 35 years in the force at shropshire,as a cheif suuperintendant,he apposed the officers claims that id been speeding,did the tests to find te distances were innacurate,to the point of lies,the actual distance was 365 metre,all with evidence of this effect, and warned the officer of the consequences at the appeals court,evenm then the oficer stated that hed made a mistake in the distances of miles instead of metres ,the cheif officer stated ,"rubbish"at my appeal, we went into court with this new evidence and my case was quashed at court,,
i then made a complaint to ipcc ,proffessional standards at cleveland police,cps,and a judge, backed up the officer simpson with his "mistake"he stated that instead of 192 metres it was the distance of 192 miles,,i appealed the standards not upheld cliams,ipcc backed the officer with he had made a genuin mistake ,which i do not except ,a close call for cleveland police, i didnt know what to do after this,
*
*
*,the loophole is "WHAT IF THEY GET IT WRONG",if your innocent "YOU HAVE NOTHING TO HIDE"quoted from mallon,and after 21 allegations of injustice against me,an officer who makes 21 arrests and those arrests are found to be unfounded allegations,a claim i made to cica for injuries for those unfounded allegations,after all it was not me who made the allegations against myself,i had no control over this,but an officer has to investigate every allegation towards taking it to court,at the taxpayers costs,which leads to my claims pushed onto me by corrupt officers who make them sorts of mistakes and anyone who makes a claim,can only do so if he has a clean record of no convictions,
*so this is what i beleive has happened to me over 8 years,its the police who falsified the facts to have me arrested and charged with a burglary i did not commit, and they stated in court that i am mad, and in need of a psycologists report,im just taking advantage of the situation, i have found myself in,if prison pays out a total of £250,000 for wrongfull imprisonment, far be it from me to not take up the opportunity of clearing my name and adding a bit of cash to myself for undergoing the treatment of corrupt officers, that noone is willing to stop,i made a claim for injuries in an attack against me in 2006,the officers locked me up after i received a broken jaw,unconscous they left me in a cell to die and lost all info to say it took place, therefore allowed the real culprits to get away with what they did to me ,now my claim is for injuries to the value of £45,000, rightfully,the cica sent me a letter on the 16 may 10,stating there going to get a police check from the national database,i have not been sentanced yet,im on tagg,i had no record beforehand,why would it stop my claims,but if i am convicted of burglary on 13 may,this is evidence that corruption does exsist from an higher authourity,and that cica has been informed,but cannot stop my claim beceause ive been chosen to be the guilty one, unofficially a guilty man, until im sentanced for this crime,i await the outcome of the cica letter,i beleive i will hear from cica after the sentance, to state" im a convicted person" so they dont have to pay me a dime,even when the ipcc upheld my claims for compensation,after 4years, if im sentanced to prison this will lead to more of a claim and more harrassment by police, unless its stopped BY YOU,even the judge may not see this,but i can make money off it,and i will,every complaint made to ipcc may not have been upheld,SHOWING AN ELABIRATE SCHEME TO DEFLECT THE BLAME,except one in 2006 ,the police to date have not rang me,appologised to me,offered any compensation,to date,that ipcc upheld for false arrets and detention was four years ago,and still the police at cleveland have not been in touch to date 17,05,10,the police have grounds to convict me,this is why i know the police set me up for this crime,because i did not do the crime alleged aginst me,this is evidence of the facts
that set me up for this offence of burglary,see it for yourself
*
*
*there is a loophole that police dont want to get out,im not surprised at all,for policing in middlesbrough,ray mallon is the mayor who states that paperwork is "stopping an officer getting onto the streets",policing in the boro needs to be changed, an idea that david cameron will be using in parliament,stopping police doing any paperwork in cleveland,this means to some, that if it is left to police officers discretion to police an area,what are the options,falsify the facts/evidence,interfere with the course of justice,not backed up by paperwork,take the training/paperwork from an officer of the law takes away the rightfull policing they should be doing,by replacing criminals on the outside of policing with criminals policing on the inside of the law,enough of the labour party
*
*ive always stated in everything ive put on the internet,against ray mallon and police in middlesbrough that what has happened to me IS an ABUSE OF ATHOURITY allowed to be administered by any part of middlesbroughs government offices,im not against police ,or anti police ,but ever since i met ray mallon ,the circustances were that id been assaulted by 8 police officers whilst in cells after being arretsed for breach of thepeace my mam wouldnt let me get cleaned up after release she took me straight to the station and to make a complaint to the superior of officers which dissapointedly remained ray mallon,he stated he was the top gaff,cheif super,at southbank station,photos and statements were took of my injuries,he stated that no evidence of an incident had been reported to him by his custody sargent last night,yet the same sargent reported to a court case that whilst on active duty he sustained 2 broken ribs and didnt know until after two weeks,,i went to court for assaulting a police officer,the charge of breach of the peace was dropped,i was never re arrested for assaulting an officer,i was found to be not guilty by a criown court case with judge fox,the officer made claims to compensation and invited me along which i ignored ,as advised,
*
*ray mallon admitted to 14 out of 400 offences and now his criminal record has been cleared by police and cps in middlesbrough is this true he is going to become the conservatives police spokesman,in my case ,over 8 years of interferance with evidence witnesses,falsified evidence and often mistakes made by officers lead to a disposal of an amount of allegations towards criminal activity,21 arrests,UNCONVICTED IN ALL, in total,not about any other persons involved ,just me,NO OTHERS WERE SOUGHT,the police corruption allegations in operation lancett enquiree,offered the public 14 out of 400 alegations ADMITTED by ray mallon,mayor of middlesbrough yet at court 13 may 10 ,NO RECORD of offences exsist by cps in middlesbrough, in my case all allegations were given out to the public and employers to render me unemployable in middlesbrough,in my crb disclosure,which lead me to apply to the court of human rights ,why am i different to him,what makes this man who failed everything given as an oportunity to him be seen so different,how did he get help to removal of disclosures after he abused children in his care as an officer of the law,after he gave children as young as 12 drugs for information,
*
*in all 21` cases of allegations of offences all except one this one,found to be unfounded ,im suffering serious depravation because of the continuous allegations of offences leads to my pcv bus licence,to stop me working as a bus driver,as i have to have a crb disclosure check for every application i made,i had a speeding allegation ,that lead to a conviction directed at my crb disclosure and my bus licence,this was quashed at court,upon appeal,the officer knowingly gave false allegation towards this conviction of points and a £350 fine,on my first offence,the officer stated that id been travelling down marske road on redcar beach,from the roundabout to the officers parked vehicle,at 60 mph,at a distance of 192 metres he showed testimony only that id been speeding ,i appealed and an investigator stated that this is not true,the distance from the roundabout to where the officer was is 360meters,the officer was shown to be incorrect,he was warned of the consequences of his testimony by the investigator,ouitside the appeal court,the officer therefore didnt attend court,and the case was quashed,not leaving it there,i put in a complaint to ipcc,they organised professional standards ex police officers to investigate my complaint,this they did and found that the police officer stated he had made a mistake in the distances from the roundabout to where the officer was parked,which is linked to the home office device lti2020 being defective, to be 192 miles,i then put to ipcc in another appeal to the professional standards conclusion of ,not upheld complaint,and the ipcc came bace with the same result as not upheld complaint,the officer made a mistake,too many mistakes or wilfull misconduct,?
*
*chicago rock nightclub 27,08,06,working as a limo driver i dropped my passengers off at dickens inn,went to southbank to drop the car off ,walked to my home and got a taxi to the town for a pint,at 11pm,i told the passengers at dickens inn they could pick up there camera at mine tommorrow they had left in my limo,walked down southfeild road,linthorpe road,albert road to the first pub ,had a pint in there,went to chicago rock cafe,had a pint and was assaulted by someone which gave me a broken jaw,injured grion,i found myself in a cell after 11 hours in pain i asked to speak to a doctor and at 130 pm he came after 10 minutes he left and i was released on bail to attend the hospital,who stated on the day i had no injuries,after six weeks, my doctor stated that id had a fractured jaw,my groin took 3years to be exposed as a problem that needed help,i put a claim for compensation in to cica,police apposed it to solicitors and cica that no incident took place and police will be apposing my claim for compensation,i reported on 28,08,06 that id been assaulted,gave her my dna contained tshirt ,that she had ordered destroyed on 19 sept 06, sgt cook dealt with it,she went to the wrong address to conclude her investigations,issac wilsons on linthorpe road middlesbrough,for chicago rock incident in which her undertstudy officer charmers had arrested me for criminal damage for 27,08,06,i was facing a court case of criminal damage for the incident in which id been locked up for for 11 hours and denied medical attention,this is the station that got pulled down,the complaint to ipcc on every occasion was not upheld until after 4 years of complaints which lead to an upheld verdict of false arrest and detention,thjey also put it in my crb disclosure for the 4 yrs as criminal damage,when i went to court no witnesses that had made the allegations of crim dam turned up at court to testify that id did anything wrong, and without evidence of an offence, the courts bound me over for 6 mths,this was to destroy my crb disclosure,with the rights to do so ,the cctv footage of holdings /custody,lost tshirt,as if the assailants have been protected from prosecution,at station went missing to show unconsciousness at the time of arrest,300am 27,08,06,no evidence of being drunk at the scene was given to ipcc,could the police tell the differance between a person who is drunk or unconscoius,how could i proove that an offence took place so i continued my pursuit to ipcc,i attended the hearing at the cica tribunal with my witness,was given £3300 for my jaw injuries,and my groin injury was ignored which has recently another compensation claim hasd gone in to cica,for the same l aim that they did not deal with at first instance and never asked for it ,i sent a claim for it again after i sent back the original admittance and ok for the check to be sent to me for 3300,which i had receipts for,for post recorded delivery,cicadidnt know this,,again,the officer cook who apposed my every claim, stated that at the tribunal " an offence of assault did take place,"

*to date the officers of cleveland police have not offered an appology or compensation for inproper disclosures in my personal crb disclosure for the criminal damage,holding me in cells for 11hours,and deniel of medical assistance,which is against my human rights as an innocent person,false arrest and detention,this was given as the police did make another mistake by ipcc,there excuse this time was;;;

As previously explained,7 MAY, an administrative error had meant that the police did not believe that any further work was necessary in relation to your complaint. I addressed this situation on 21 April 2010 and made them aware that part of your complaint still required attention, so effectively the period of 'inactivity' on your complains runs from that date. I, therefore, expect that you will be contacted by the police force shortly.
*
*my uncle was smashed into at a traffic lights,as he worked as a taxi driver,,police were in attendance,but no investigation was carried out against a driver who had obviously been speeding and smashed into him,loosing all chances to claim rightfully damages from his injuries,
*
*my father had previously been arrested for having no mot on his new car,he had had it done the day before,we went to stockton for a mornings walk,had breakfast in the town,we came back to find a stolen car on my front,a little way from my garden,the police came over and asked if we had seen anything,we had just came back from stockton how could we,the officer must have been on my front longer than me,i said no and didnt want to know,went inthen my fathjer was arretsed outside my front and marched past my home with handcuffs on him at 56 years old,intimidation tactics i put it down too,

********************************************************************************************************
THIS IS THE ALLEGATION RECENTLY,criminal allegations of burglary,NOTE instead of criminal damgaege which was offered to me by my barrister at a court case that prosecution agreed too,i denied there offer,

evidence to date at court and statements given at court,for burglary,

*three blood samples,sg3 sg4 sg5

*trainers matching samba,taken from 155 marshall ave,
*
*new witness statements not previously given to court, were read out in court
*spriggs,14,02,10
*gettings,18,02,10
*milner,17,02,10
*green,12,02,10
*pacey,18,02,10
*barker,10,03,10
*cathrall,18,02,10
*cochrane,19,02,10
*johnson,17,02,10,
*
*ALL OF THESE STATEMNENTS were after the fact written on these dates given as evidence and most were not read out in court or turned up for the court hearing
*
*
*MY CASE HISTORYthis is the amount of cases heard at teeside crown court,:
25,03,09for mention at crown,
8october,plea and case management for crown court
06 october09,crown court hearing
20october,bail at police station answered
26november09,trail, crown court hearing
02december09,crown court hearing,at which judge fox told prosecution to have all the evidence into court and given to defence by 25 march,for mention,
12january10,at crown court hearing
15febuary10,at crown court hearing,
25march10, at crown for mention,
10 may10 to 13 may 10,at court for three days hearing found guilty at court with a jury for the first time,
**on 15 febuary 10,the judge ordered that all disclosures were given to the defence by the 25 march 10,and we did not receive the disclosures we asked for from the prosecution,cps,or police
*
*my benefits at beresford buildings jsa were stopped for 8months in 2007,by a magistrate called geof prior
*
*my brother recieved 9 points on his licence as a self employed person,
*
*this is the list of witnesses brought in after 23 march,and the dates there statements were given as to crown court hearing on 10 may10 below
*spriggs,14,02,10,GETTINGS18,02,10,MILNER17,02,10,GREEN,12,02,10,PACEY,18,02,10BARKER,10,03,
10CATHERALL,18,02,10,COCHRANE,19,02,10JOHNSON,17,02,10
**
*my trainers were never photographed by GREEN forensics on 22 march,or 23 march, before one officer CRAWFORD took them from the address he gave as 155 marshall ave,stating it was my address,
*
*
*i received 15may the ipcc complaint given to police for the assault 20 november09,after id made a complaint that as a 999 call the police did not attend my home where id been assaulted,until 05 dec 09,therefore loosing the assailants for good,giving them time to create an alibi,didnt even bother to come out to see me,death doesnt even bother the police
*
* over 900 complaints have gone to ipcc over a period of 5 years from the public,not just mine,all not upheld

*
*recent court appearances to show corruption,all facts that are backed up by actual case hearings,police arrests,court transcripts,and notes held by me,this is NOT a conspiracy,corruption still exsists in cleveland police force,under ray mallon as mayor of operation lancett enquiree,
*
over an 8year period from 2002 to 2010,was the unfounded allegations from 21 witnesses,all 21 unfounded allegations when brought to court,this case only 1 found guilty of burglary,this case,
*
*NO CUTS to my hands were found on the day of my arrest,linked to any form of dna found at the scene by CRAWFORD,
*
*no paint was found inside my home next door to the damaged property,by GREEN OR CRAWFORD22,march09
*
*no paint was found on any of my clothes found to connect me to a damaged house full to the brim of paint spread all over walls,ceilings,doors,windows,by GREEN OR CRAWFORD OR FORENSICS LAB,22march09
*
*my crowbar taken from my home on 23 march ,was never conclusive towards a connection to me being near the damaged property,not by police or forensics GREEN or CRAWFORD OR FORENSICS,22march,10 may10
*
*paint found on a radiator in the passage of the damaged house was dry at court according to GREEN,22march,yet the house had damage to the ceilings in all rooms which contained WATER damage from pipes,radiators pulled from the walls,,toilets smashed, that were all damaged upstairs,by GREEN OR FORENSICS, 22march09
**in a room full to the brim of splashed paint of various kinds,were found, in the damaged house next door to me,one CLEAN door in the middle of the room of splashed paint was found,by GREEN FORENSICS,22march09,with ONE footprint of a samba shoe print,by GREEN FORENSICS,22 march09
*
*at court NO record of paint samples were found on the trainers ,by GREEN or FORENS LAB,that was taken either from my home or the property of 155 marshall ave,me living at 155 palister ave,22march09
*
*i was arrested for the same offence TWICE,they stated that id been arrested for the same amount of £50,000 damage for the second offence,this was quashed,i have a copy of the search warrent as 155 milbrook ave,this was not mentioned at court,my solicitor stated it was not to be mentioned,dont know why this to me would have shown to be false allegation and contempt also interferance with the course of justice,
*
*3 samples of blood dna sg3 sg4 sg5 was delivered by pacey to hq ladgate lane, to MILNER,MILNER only receives one sg4 dna sample of blood,
*
*cps and police deneid my barrister any information towards officers connected to my case and ray mallons operation lancett files,they state he has NO RECORD,it was asked for our defence on 10 may to 13 may 10,it was refused by cps and police,for this crown court proceedure,
*
*i was arrested twice for the same offence,my neighbour was interveiwed by the police too,by CRAWFORD
*
*blood shown to the jury was contaminated with paint or it was all paint,
*
*witness admits entry to the damaged house on a number of occasions at court,3 dna samples were delivered to milner and only one dna sample was received after transit to hq,2 samples were unexplained as to where they were
*
*i have been arretsted 21 times, unconnvicted, throughout a 8 year period
,the same amount of time mallon spent as mayor of cleveland police officers
*
*trainers said to be taken from my home were taken in statements at the wrong address of 155 marshal ave
* this was seen as a mistake,was it a mistake,or did the officer state in his statements that of which was on his mind at the time,23march 09.
*
*an officer,green, stated on the court stand that the station at northormesby was unsafe as to sealed forensics lab,as anyone with a key for the old police station could gain access,
*
*the dc officer states in his statement,that he had the dna samples ion 23 march when on 22 march they were sent to northormsby forensics lab,
*
*on 23 march,dc crawford,officer states in his statement,that was never given in to the court proceedings, that the blood dna found by him and was sent by him to lab,and it was a concluded sample connecting to me on 23 march 09,he also states that on the 23 march the dna found on the radiator was mine,
before a verdict from forensics in his statements,
*
*forensics connected dna samples against me on 7 october, 7 months later,
*
*pacey delivered samples of dna on the day my blood was taken off me at the station by a none doctor,a security guard,no cctv footage was given or allowed to be given by cps for our defence after being asked for it
*
*no help was given to my barrister, for evidence of corrupt officers in operation lancett,in connection with officers connected to my case,it was refused,a refusal,contempt of court
*
*CRAWFORD had a chance to meet with pacey on 23march,enter my home and falsify the facts as to trainers and dna
*
*crawford dc in charge of this investigation, admits on the stand in court,that he NEVER ENTERED 10 MILBROOKK AVE,
*
*evidence went to billingham after hq ladgate lane
noone knew how or why,no excuse was given by police to this court, why it ended up in billingham ,
,although PACEY delivered it to northormesby from billingham,in her new court uncategorised statements,
*
*two officers involved in my arrest,CRAWFORD an CHAYTOR,
officer CRAWFORD officer CHAYTORS notes were not given,CHAYTOR DID,although it contained 6 lines of words from,CHAYTORS statements were not given as evidence IN COURT,
as if he didnt want to know,
officer CRAWFORD STATES HE enters my home23MARCH09, on his OWN and without CHAYTOR,he then took a pair of trainers from 155 marshal ave, the mistake he states, as i live at 155 palister ave,
*
*officer CRAWFORD,witness,was allowed to sit throughout the 3day court case 10 may10, - 13 may 10,even though an appeal can be heard after the verdict/sentance
*
*a picture of my own vehicle was not given as evidence to this court,it showed my van, to have words on it,it was brought into court to show bias against ray mallon,this is my own property and i can write what i want on my own property about the election,,its a civil action,nothing to do with police ,but used in this case of burglary allegations,it was never given to show as evidence in any documents given to this court, yet used as evidence against me
*
*15 witnesses were produced at court in statements and before, during, and after the proceedings,
*
*4 witnesses turned up to court to give there views
*
*8 witnesses named in the original court evidence lists
*
*2 arresting officers CRAWFORD and CHAYTOR
*
*1 arresting officer gave his testimony in court CRAWFORD
*
*1 officer CRAWFORD,never gave his notes to court,,,, or my solicitor, when asked for,,,,,previous to court,,,,
*
*1 witness REYNOLDS turned up at court, admitted walking through the crime schene with another officer ON 22MARCH09
*
*none of the witness statements were sighned before going to court,10may10,
*
* GREEN STATES,there was DRIPPED BLOOD ON THE RADIATOR,as if a cut was a large cut,
with no cuts on me on 23march 09.
*
*L EDWARDS, FORENSICS EXPERT,backs up CRAWFORDS statement saying that CRAWFORD went to the address of 155 MARSHAL AVE,me living at 155 palister ave,
*
*A NEILSON FORENSICS EXPERT,states she only did forensics work on the sample she was given sg4,ONLY,yet later on no evidence of dna samples sg3 and sg4 were given as to evidence
*
*RICHARD GARTON FORENSICS EXPERT,backs up CRAWFORD that he entered the property of 155 MARSHAL AVE ,me living at 155 palister ave,on the 23 march
CRAWFORD obtained trainers from 155 MARSHAL AVE,me living at 155 palister ave
**
*ANNE NEILSON FORENSICS LAB WEATHERFEILD,STATES that on /...........21 MARCH 09.............,police stated a ground floor window had been forced open at 10 milbrook ave ,blood staining was observed at the schene sg3-5,were submitted to the lab at weatherfield,
SG4 WAS NOT MENTIONED IN THE DETAILS BY POLICE ACCORDING TO HER TESTIMONY,AT ALL,
THEN SHE STATES on 20 april she receives at the sceince lab weatherfield sg4, blood from the radiator of 10 milbrook ave,
*
* sg3 and sg5 were not mentioned in her testimony AS TO A forensics conclusion,SO WHERE IS THE OTHERS WITH THE BACKING OF FORENSICS THAT THEY WERE TESTED TO SEE IF THEY WERE MY DNA RESULTS,SHE ALSO DID NOT ATTEND THE COURT HEARING ON 10-13 MAY10,
*
*GREEN STATES,THAT HE RECOVERED THE FOLLOWING EXHIBITS SG2,SG3,SG4,SG5,which were labelled and packaged on sunday 22march09,he took a series of photos showing paint across the front path of the neighbours home 155 MARSHAL ave,i live at 155 palister ave,
*
*dna found at the scene was contaminated by others walking throughout the property,REYNOLDS
*no fingerprints/sweat dna were found at the scene, yet blood DID, according to officers GREEN and CRAWFORD
*
*all evidence was contaminated and not sealed as it was removed by others on a number of occasions inside middlehaven police station,after BLOOD was taken from me in her statements
*
8officer in statements stated,not in court though, that anyone with knowledge could enter the forensics lab
*
*ALL FORENSIC STATED,that it may be neccasary to REVISE MY CONCLUSION,if any information given to forensics by police or cps was found to differ,change,or is shown to be incorrector that significant information becomes known to me,
*
*no motive was established behond reasonable doubt that i was to blame for a £100,000 damage spree at THIS court hearing on 13 may10,
officer dc crawford was the only officer out of two arretsing officers to give statements to this court,why,did he want nothing to do with this case,
*
*crawford states he looked into the front of the window at the damaged property,and never went into the house ,why,the window was barred from veiw by brown venishion blinds,he omitted to state this to the court,
*
*trainers were not taken on 22 march by green
trainers were taken from 155 marshall ave,on 23 march,
trainers were not taken by two arresting officers,
one officer came back to a house on his own as part of two arresting officers,to take trainers from 155 marshall ave,me living at 155 palister ave
*
*my neighbours agree to this and the patrons from the club who also veiwed the property damage
*
*hump it and dump it removed all the damaged articles from the house on 23 march,
*
*CRAWFORD never brought or read out his notes in court at all,
*
*forensics were still collecting all evidence from the house to date 24 march 09,
*
* no record of paint,sampled from the trainers given to court were conclusively given by any forensics,towards the damaged house and paint thrown all over the inside of it were given to court by forensics
*
*no cctv footage of the police station when my blood was taken off me by a civilian, was allowed to be given by cps or police in this case
**,
*everyone knew operation lancett enquiree exsisted,ashok kumar attached as mp, to the operation lancett case ,died,of a heart attack,unusual this, so did my neighbour, whos house i was accused of damaging,after an authourity bank jp morgan bought it,after we met ray mallon outside a shop in the town.its well known that after the operation lancett enquiree that all police would be protected as a result of it by all mps,it should never cost this amount again,they said in the commons,all solicitors and newspapers are blocked in middlesbrough from proceedures against any police officer as a result,so noone can get a case against corruption in the police force in middlesbrough,.
*
*i used every chance of getting myself recorded as to my complaints when i found something unusual over 35 to ipcc,all not upheld except one ,when i was a victim of a crime,assaulted,unconscious i was left in a cell to die for 11 hours,denied medical help,broken jawgrion injury was denied,conteracted by police on my claim for compensation for 4 years,finally allowed me £3500 after the arretsting officer staed i was a victim of a crime ,even though she ordered evidence removed and distroyed,ipcc upheld my complaint and no responce to date has been given by the cheif of police,in evidence for the past towards they have donne it before and lost evidence in a case of corruption,
*
*15 may10,today i found a reason for why cleveland police would falsify evidence against me in a court case ,"to have me convicted "a recent claim for compensation amounting to £89,000 was made four years ago ,the one ipcc upheld,aginst cleveland police,with a conviction the cica will take the conviction into account four years ago and stop a claim for compensation today
*
*the courts stated that i had an obsession against ray mallon, which i had to be carefull of, in case being taken to court,the fact is that i have no obsession with him at all,the facts are obvious that im being sought after,police are behind all what is keeping me out of work,unable to receive medical help,no other offenders are included in any of my 21 arrests,is this the normal behavour of a licenced bus driver with a full clean licence,or am i trying to fight fire with fire,giving the police a peace of string to hang themselves with,and in the process of mistakes by police tell someone in authourity about it,like the officials ipcc,who should no about it and dont deal with it themselves,a police officer does.the courts tried to say im mental like they did with my father,i have to have a sicology report for sentancing and a probation report too,as well as being tagged till sentancing,
*
*the fact remains that over an 8 year period since ray mallon was made mayor of middlesbrough ,i have been subject to harrassment that no authourity will deal with,my car has been damaged,ive been assaulted in my home,twice,damage has been done to my home,freinds involved in my cases twice have died,in unexplained circumstance,people known to authourity have unexplained deaths,its all facts,ashok kumar dealt with operation lancett files,dead,eric cutler dealt with being a witness in my case,dead,darren coulson,died in jail, apparently hung himself,vinny next door dies of the same condition ashok kumar died of.heart attack,
*
*crawford had the motive to see that id been blamed for this offence,quota to meet,as a police dc
*TO DATE NO OFFICERS HAVE OFFERED ME A SETTLEMENT TO THE IPCC UPHELD CLAIM FOR FALSE ARREST AND DETENTION,HELD IN A CELL FOR 11HOURS ,DENIED MEDICAL HELP,APPOSING MY CLAIM FOR COMPENSATION,LOOSING EVIDENCE,CRB DISCLOSURES ABUSES AND DATA FRAUD, FROM 4 YEARS AGO,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,EXCEPT THEY DID HOWEVER GIVE ME A CONVICTION FOR BURGLARY
*
*the house owner had more motive to do the damage or pay someone to damage the property
*
* then i was found guilty AFTER 10 MINUTES by a jury
*
*14MAY 10,CICA SENT A LETTER ABOUT LOOKING FOR A CRIMINAL HISTORY CHECK FROM LONDON,this will take several months,they stated,giving time for the sentance to be given against me for a crime i did not commit,will cica get a criminal conviction from cleveland police,before im sentanced by a court,
*
*police did not disclose the full amount of disclosures to courts,
*
*14may10,this was sent to ipcc as a complaint against cleveland police officers, today by email,
my name is neil scott,i live